And it factors in the ability each company gives you to control your data. The score is a measure of how the company says it collects, shares, and uses your data. I would make sure that they are not too confident in the AV, too.This year, for the first time, we've also given each of the programs a data-privacy score, using the open-source guidelines outlined in the Digital Standard. You can always get viruses from the network that will silently exploit an unfixed security breach on any system, and that may remain undetected so at least, I would tell them to be careful, to keep their system updated and to make backups regularly (ideally, backups should be automatic to some extent), since AVs can't guarantee that no virus will make it. If there is an AV provided by Apple or by some other company you trust, I guess I would go for it rather than having nothing.
BEST ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE 2018 FOR MAC WINDOWS
Would I recommend AV for somebody who uses an OS that is more targeted by viruses than mine, and is likely to fell in a trap (the kind of trap an AV would catch anyway)? Probably Windows Defender on Windows, for Macs I really don't know. And also blocking Javascript or third party Javascript by default when browsing, which I did at some point in my life but which is not convenient for most people. One could add usage of Google safe browsing or something related for phishing. and I also happen to never be browsing sketchy websites. instant backups in a self hosted cloud for important things, and automatic daily snapshots of this cloud somewhere else usage of an ad blocker with more filters than the default that is preferably installed from the OS vendor, which I have no choice to trust anyway.
BEST ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE 2018 FOR MAC FREE
Using only free software, as much as possible (I know, I would need to audit everything I use for this to be perfect, but I can't possibly do that). AVs didn't catch ransomwares when they first appeared after all.
They are irritating and advertise themselves in people's mail signatures, sometimes outright lying: "this email as no viruses" - That you can't be sure, and the mail could have got a virus in its way between the sender and the recipient.īy design, AVs can't really detect new viruses and I would not feel really more confident with an AV than without because of that. On the other side, I would bet it is in the interest of other AVs to always nag you and make you feel they are present and useful more than being actually efficient for other things than high detection rates in benchmarks. I can't be sure tough: why is it not integrated by default (or is it?)? To allow competition? Then is Microsoft making their antivirus less efficient so the competition is still relevant? And maybe AV is not really Microsoft's main business so their antivirus may be lacking? On Windows, I would probably use the one from Microsoft, since it's free and since I would already "trust" Microsoft by using their OS and I would somewhat bet that it is in their interest to keep their OS safe. I see AVs as another piece of proprietary software that you have to trust, and that takes significant resources without knowing how useful they are. I don't use a macOS so I can't really say. This was detected by the IT department by monitoring suspicious traffic. I don't know if they had an AV, and if so, if the AV would have caught the miner. No matter how you slice it, the cost/benefit pretty much never favors AV.Īt INRIA (a French computer science research institute), AV became mandatory on Macs last year.Ī colleague of mine got hit recently by a crypto-miner on their Mac. And if they are that dumb then nothing will help them anyway. They may not know the details of how their computers work but they know sketchy looking crap when they see it. Most people aren't as dumb as your ego likes to imagine them to be. You might be thinking "that's all well and good for us computer geeks who know what's what, but what about everyone else?". And the for profit ones tend toward the latter, because if you never notice it you won't believe it is actually doing anything and might not continue your subscription.
At worst they are constantly getting in your way with false positives (which train you to ignore any potentially legitimate alerts) and breaking everything. About the only place it makes any sense is in your email filters or anywhere else the public can send random bullshit.Īt best they incur an ever present performance hit while only catching the lowest of low-hanging fruit. It is my considered opinion that "no anti-virus" is still the best practice for nearly everything.
0 kommentar(er)
